Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Want to play a weird little forum game? Enjoy!

Moderators: Silver, shauni

Post Reply
User avatar
PoisonWing14
Shiny Shedinja
Posts: 5234
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:15 pm
Location: Here, or a place other then There.

Re: Count to 15,000! Formerly 5,000 and 10,000

Post by PoisonWing14 »

10,472 is oddly jumpy tonight.
~ Quotes n' Stuff ~
"I have to blow everything up! It's the only way to prove I'm not crazy!"
- Gordon Freeman, "Freeman's Mind" - Episode 29
"Remember: Not only does crime not pay, but you don't get a health plan, either."
- Nick Brick, Lego Island

ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Most of Counting Games

Post by Josiah »

10,473 is preparing for a wedding.
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Most of Counting Games

Post by Josiah »

10,474 is testing things.
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Most of Counting Games

Post by Josiah »

This is a null post which is not to be counted in order to correct for the now missing first post.
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Josiah »

10,475 fixed the thread!!! (Well, sorta. More like a big work around.))
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Silver »

10,476 has kind of missed this thread.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Josiah »

10,477 agrees.
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Silver »

10,478 needs to get back to work on coloring...
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Josiah »

10,479 agrees.
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Silver »

10,480 is posting from work! He just kind of assumed it would be blocked because everything is but it's not!
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Stevenson
Shiny Wobbuffet Prince
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: The Undisclosed Location

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Stevenson »

10,481 is not surprised that a niche forum is not blocked.
Stevenson's Vocabulary Word of the Week:

Foment: (verb) To excite or arouse, i.e. 2014's Week of Randomness hopes to foment some activity on the forums.


Stevenson's Latin Phrase of the Week:

Brutum Fulmen: (senseless thunderbolt) This phrase, coined by Pliny the elder, is used to refer to an empty threat.
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Silver »

10,482 would like to mention that the blocks are... very general, and did not expect Pebble Version specifically to be blocked, but phpbb boards in general.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Josiah »

10,483 thinks most blocks are domain based, so PV would slip by a lot of them.
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Silver »

10,484 still doesn't understand how google docs can be blocked but not forums, but here we are.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Re: Count to 15,000 (Originally 5,000 & 10,000)!

Post by Josiah »

10,485 is worn out.
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
Post Reply