IP Advance: The Game! Discussion Thread
Moderators: Silver, shauni, Saber Knight
-
Neo Zanther
- Pokémon Champion
- Posts: 8127
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:40 am
- Location: Deep in the Dark forest of D-Edge
-
Neo Zanther
- Pokémon Champion
- Posts: 8127
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:40 am
- Location: Deep in the Dark forest of D-Edge
-
Silver
- Shiny Pidgeot King
- Posts: 18079
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
- Contact:
Ah... yeah, you should have mentioned that. You... also shouldn't have used Hyper Fang. Base power is 80, and when being used by an evolved Pokemon on one that's never won a battle...
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
I make a motion that we make a new IPA Dex thread to eventually replace the old one.
The old one works but it's a bit of a mess. For starters the entry for each IP should list name, type, currently known evolutions, abilities, starting moves, and moves that it's known to learn at later levels. If we want to be completist we could also list, effect, power, and accuracy for all those moves and abilities.
Some form of organization would by good too. Perhaps group the IPAs by post (since Silver, I, or anyone else with mod powers can edit posts later to add new info) and then sort them either by type or alphabetically.
So, thoughts, comments, opinions?
The old one works but it's a bit of a mess. For starters the entry for each IP should list name, type, currently known evolutions, abilities, starting moves, and moves that it's known to learn at later levels. If we want to be completist we could also list, effect, power, and accuracy for all those moves and abilities.
Some form of organization would by good too. Perhaps group the IPAs by post (since Silver, I, or anyone else with mod powers can edit posts later to add new info) and then sort them either by type or alphabetically.
So, thoughts, comments, opinions?
I agree, it is a mess. I started the last IPAdex, but I was doing it on a dial up so I rushed it.
"BOW BEFORE THE SHAUNINESS THAT IS SHAUNI! "--Shadowman
"Shauni fell down a drainage ditch and died. That was the end of her pokemon journey. "--Shauni
Go to ROM the Comic
"Shauni fell down a drainage ditch and died. That was the end of her pokemon journey. "--Shauni
Go to ROM the Comic
-
Silver
- Shiny Pidgeot King
- Posts: 18079
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
- Contact:
Truth be told? I've already started it. I had wanted to do that and fix up (read: completely redo) some of the sprites from the beginning...
I created a freewebs site for it (Yay having multiple e-mail adresses!) and I'll post the link when it's a bit less empty. Although it... shouldn't be to hard to figure it out yourself.
I created a freewebs site for it (Yay having multiple e-mail adresses!) and I'll post the link when it's a bit less empty. Although it... shouldn't be to hard to figure it out yourself.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
-
Neo Zanther
- Pokémon Champion
- Posts: 8127
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:40 am
- Location: Deep in the Dark forest of D-Edge
-
Silver
- Shiny Pidgeot King
- Posts: 18079
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
- Contact:
There are two Vulithe and a Snubshrew still there. I've tried to be good about editing the post in which they first appeared.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
-
Neo Zanther
- Pokémon Champion
- Posts: 8127
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:40 am
- Location: Deep in the Dark forest of D-Edge
-
Silver
- Shiny Pidgeot King
- Posts: 18079
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
- Contact:
Being a Rock type, no, he can't. *mayonnaise'd*
Yes, he can, I just had to put something in this post besides 'yes'.
Yes, he can, I just had to put something in this post besides 'yes'.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
-
Silver
- Shiny Pidgeot King
- Posts: 18079
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
- Contact:
When I left you I was the learner; now, I am the master... *mayonnaise'd*
A bit late for St. Patrick's Day, I suppose, but hey...
A bit late for St. Patrick's Day, I suppose, but hey...
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.