Josiah wrote:Wait a second... *Double checks chart.* Holy crap you're right! Wow... I didn't even know that... Well, I suppose I must have since I've gone over the compatability chart so many times but I guess it just never sunk in before...
Remember that next time you find yourself up against an Aerodactyl - Electric attacks are super effective.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate." Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate." Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Neo Zanther wrote:(sorry for interupting, but what is the line up of trainers want to battle Gym Leaders as of now?)
((You probably should've posted this in the OOC thread, but... Gar's going to fight Roxanne, then Cheesey's going to fight Brawly. I think that's it...))
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate." Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Doodleshark wrote:Shiver me timbers, this lad be walkin' the plank! Yargh! [/Talk Like a Pirate Day]
Translation: Scythix, finish this fight with a Brick Break!
OMG four times effective! Nosel used Harden! (Yes, you have major type advantage, but it didn't finish the fight because they're the same level. And Nosel has crazy defense.)
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate." Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate." Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Gardialvoir wrote:Ok, my turn. Sandblaster, come on out!
Roxanne sent out Seedude!
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate." Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate." Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
